emaisha Pay

Designing a trusted financial platform for Africa’s agricultural economy

emaisha Pay enables farmers to save, receive payments, transfer money, and access funding to grow their businesses with confidence.


Unlike traditional fintech apps, this platform serves users who:


  • May have low digital literacy

  • Operate in rural environments

  • Depend on seasonal income cycles

  • Are highly sensitive to transaction errors


This wasn’t just about moving money. It was about building financial trust in a high-stakes ecosystem.

KAMPALA, UG

16:33

KAMPALA, UG

16:33

Client

Client

eMaisha Pay

eMaisha Pay

eMaisha Pay

Industry

Industry

Agri-Fintech

Agri-Fintech

Agri-Fintech

Role

Role

Product / UX Designer

Product / UX Designer

Product / UX Designer

Product Focus

Product Focus

Payments, Savings, Funding Access

Payments, Savings, Funding Access

Payments, Savings, Funding Access

The Problem

Farmers and agribusiness users faced:

  • Anxiety around real-money transfers

  • Low visibility into transaction status

  • Confusion around savings vs. operational balance

  • Limited understanding of funding eligibility

  • Fear of making irreversible financial mistakes


From a business perspective:

  • Trust directly affects adoption

  • Failed transfers damage brand credibility

  • Poor clarity reduces funding uptake

  • Drop-offs during onboarding limit growth


The platform needed to feel safe, clear, and reliable.

Constraints


  • Real-time payment processing dependencies

  • Regulatory compliance requirements

  • Limited engineering bandwidth

  • Need for extremely high clarity in financial interactions

  • Designing for users with inconsistent internet access


Every decision had financial and operational implications.

My Approach

1. Design for Financial Confidence

In fintech, clarity reduces anxiety.


I focused on:

  • Strong visual confirmation states

  • Explicit transaction progress indicators

  • Clear balance separation (Savings vs Available funds)

  • Transparent fee communication before confirmation


The goal: eliminate ambiguity at every money-touchpoint.

2. Reduce Onboarding Friction

Initial onboarding required 6 key information steps.

Through field prioritization and progressive disclosure, we reduced it to 4 critical steps.


33% reduction in onboarding steps.:

This increased onboarding completion rate by an estimated 18%.

3. Improve Transfer Completion & Trust

We redesigned the money transfer flow to:

  • Show clear review screens before submission

  • Highlight recipient details prominently

  • Introduce visual reassurance elements

  • Improve error recovery patterns


Post-release results showed:

  • 16% increase in successful transfer completion

  • 21% reduction in transaction-related support inquiries

  • 28% improvement in user-reported transaction confidence

4. Increase Funding Feature Adoption

Many users were unaware or unsure about funding eligibility.


We:

  • Simplified funding qualification explanations

  • Used clear eligibility indicators

  • Reduced cognitive load in application forms


Through usability validation, we saw:

Funding application initiation increased by 22%.

Trade-offs


  • Some compliance requirements required dense information screens

  • Certain flows required mandatory confirmation screens due to financial regulations

  • Offline-first design had limitations in real-time validation


Rather than oversimplifying, I designed clarity within compliance boundaries.

Trust > visual minimalism

Outcomes

"Strengthened financial trust through clearer transaction states and transparent funding flows, increasing user confidence by 28% and driving measurable growth in platform engagement."

© 2026 AD | www.natiiive.com

waymakandrew@gmail.com

waymakandrew@gmail.com

waymakandrew@gmail.com